Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Parkford

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1922No. L. A. No. 7076PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

This appeal is from a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor in an action brought to recover the sum of $4,500 with interest alleged to be the balance due plaintiff upon a certain contract in writing for the purchase by the defendant from the assignor of plaintiff of certain manure and fertilizer upon a certain portion of a ranch in Nevada known as the Marker Field. The defendant in his answer admits the making of said contract, but denies that the plaintiff’s assignor performed the conditions and covenants therein contained to be by her kept and performed; and denies that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Inman Bros. v. Dudley & Daniels Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  4. Timlin v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Cole v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Biglione v. BrongeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API