Legal Opinion
Mukarker v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 12, 2016No. Civil Action No. 16-10355-PBSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Saris, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Nikola Mukarker filed this diversity action against the City of Philadelphia (the City), the Philadelphia International Airport (the Airport), and Otis Elevator Company (Otis), based on premises liability against all Defendants (Count I), and strict liability against Otis (Count II). The City and the Airport moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ■12(b)(2).1 After hearing, the Court ALLOWS the Motion to Dismiss, because the defendants did not purposefully avail themselves of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Angulo v. Providence Health & Services WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Kingston v. AngioDynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021