Legal Opinion

Moss v. Hawaiian Dredging Co. Larsen v. Flood Bros.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1951No. 12571_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, some 1200 walking bosses and warehousemen employed in the long-shore and stevedoring industry in the San Francisco Bay area, brought 32 actions against the appellees, their employers, to recover overtime compensation and liquidated damages claimed to be owing under § 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219. The cases were consolidated for trial.

The facts upon which the actions are predicated are that these workers were paid at an agreed hourly rate for a basic 30-hour workweek, consisting of the first six hours of work between 8…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Mary E. Hammond, Individually and Mary E. Hammond as She is the of the Estate of Charles E. Hammond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. Addison v. Huron Stevedoring Corp. Aaron v. Bay Ridge Operating Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Flournoy v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Jackpot Harvesting Co. v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API