Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Southern Nevada Memorial Hospital

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1954No. 3799PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Merrill, J.:

This is an appeal from order of the trial court dismissing the complaint of appellant as plaintiff below. The sole question raised is whether respondent hospital is subject to suit for tort. The trial court ruled that it was not. This respondent is a public hospital established by Clark County pursuant to the authority of sec. 2225 et seq., N.C.L.1929, Supp. 1943-1949. The individual respondents are the elected hospital trustees and are sued in that capacity.

Appellant, as plaintiff, alleges in her complaint that while a patient at the hospital she suffered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Granite Oil Securities, Inc. v. Douglas CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cauble v. BeemerNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  3. McKay v. Washoe General HospitalNevada Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turner v. StaggsNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hughey v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  3. King v. BaskinNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hardgrave v. State Ex Rel. State Highway DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hardgrave v. State Ex Rel. State Highway DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API