Legal Opinion

Tanaka

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 11, 1976No. 330-75PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Military pay; correction of military records; passovers for-promotion; arbitrary and capricious action; administrative discretion. — On June 11,1976 the court entered the following-order.: ........

Stephen G. Anderson, with, whom was Assistant Attorney ■General Bex E. Zee, for defendant. Before Daws, Judge, Presiding, Nichols and KttNzig, . Judges.

“In this military pay case, before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the controlling issue is whether the , Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) was arbitrary and capricious in not correcting the record of the plaintiff. He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  2. Boyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Hary v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. Deering v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Guy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Stewart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API