Legal Opinion
Tanaka
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 11, 1976No. 330-75PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Military pay; correction of military records; passovers for-promotion; arbitrary and capricious action; administrative discretion. — On June 11,1976 the court entered the following-order.: ........
Stephen G. Anderson, with, whom was Assistant Attorney ■General Bex E. Zee, for defendant. Before Daws, Judge, Presiding, Nichols and KttNzig, . Judges.
“In this military pay case, before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the controlling issue is whether the , Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) was arbitrary and capricious in not correcting the record of the plaintiff. He…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dorl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Boyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
3Cited by18 opinions
- Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Hary v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Deering v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Guy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Stewart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.