Legal Opinion
Beverley v. Mickelberry Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Supreme Court, New York *293County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered January 13, 1989, denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a letter agreement on June 13, 1972, wherein plaintiff’s services were described as "identifying certain acquisition candidates and bringing them to the attention of the [defendant]”. After naming a particular acquisition candidate, the agreement, drafted by the defendant’s chairman, James Marlas, who is an attorney, "confirmed] that you…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Simon v. Electrospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Janos v. PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Janos v. PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transparent Value, L.L.C. v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Barrister Referrals, Ltd. v. Windels, Marx, Davies & IvesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991