Legal Opinion
Litton Industries, Inc. v. IMO Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 2, 2009No. A-10/11 September Term 2008Published
1Opinion of the Court
982 A.2d 420 (2009)
200 N.J. 372
LITTON INDUSTRIES, INC. and Litton Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents and Cross-Appellants,
v.
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., Varo, Inc., Baird Corporation and Optic-Electronic International, Inc., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Respondents.
A-10/11 September Term 2008
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued December 2, 2008.
Decided November 2, 2009.
George C. Lamb, III, a member of the Texas bar, Dallas, TX, argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents (Duane Morris, attorneys; Frank A. Luchak, on the briefs, Princeton).
James T. Smith, argued the cause for…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Pickett v. Lloyd'sSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. CollierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Hisenaj v. KuehnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.