Teck General Partnership v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
In this removed diversity environmental tort case, plaintiffs attempt to obtain a nonprejudicial dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., is opposed by defendant. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs motion must be denied.
I
On June 19, 1998, plaintiff filed a motion for judgment in the Circuit Court for Fairfax County in the Commonwealth of Virginia alleging that its property has been damaged and contaminated by the migration of petroleum from defendant’s property, a Crown Service Station, to plaintiffs adjoining property. Relying on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nannette B. Davis v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- S.A. Andes v. Versant Corporation, and First Washington Investments Corporation and Thomas F. HerrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Rollison v. Washington Nat. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- S. Victor Paturzo v. Home Life Insurance Company, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Carroll v. Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by24 opinions
- Aventis Pasteur, Inc. v. SkevofilaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- In re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Jandrt Ex Rel. Brueggeman v. Jerome Foods, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Hisler v. Gallaudet UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Shabazz v. Pya Monarch, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.