Legal Opinion

Hallyburton v. Burke County Fair Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Civri. actioN, for damages, tried before Brown, J., and a jury, at-May, 189b, Special Term of McDowkll Superior Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of Associate Justice Montgombry.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgombry, J.:

The plaintiff in his complaint alleged that Ilinlde, Craig M Co. and T. L. Craig, at the fair held by defendant, the Burke County Fair Association, at Morgan ton, in October. 1891, were permitted and allowed by the fair association to enter and run a horse which, they know to be wild and dangerous and untrained, in a race upon the course of the defendant association ; that the defendant association, knowing, when they permitted the other defendants to enter and run the horse, that he was wild and dangerous and untrained, had failed and neglected to have the race-course enclosed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. Washington Park ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Harris v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hughey v. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Plumidies v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Griner v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Smith v. Cumberland County Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. O'Keefe v. Cheyenne Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API