Legal Opinion

Logan City v. Carlsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1978No. 15739PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Defendant, David Craig Carlsen (“Carl-sen”), appeals his traffic offense conviction of “following too close” in violation of Section 42-8-8 of the Revised Ordinance of Logan City, 1969, which reads in pertinent part as follows:(a) The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon and the conditions of the street.

Carlsen tyas initially tried and convicted of said offense in the Logan City Court. He thereafter sought and obtained a trial de novo 1 in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. People v. De CasausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. State v. BushPortage County Court of Common Pleas · 1962
  5. People v. Heid, New York County Courts1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. KennedyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Stephen Nolan v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  4. State v. ChindgrenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. State v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API