Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Travelers Insurance
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 17, 1964No. File 26819PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment determining whether or not the plaintiff is under a duty or obligation, by virtue of an insurance policy issued by it to the defendant Joseph Poray-Wybranowski, to arbitrate a claim of that defendant.
The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company issued a family automobile poliey to Poray-Wybranowski which included protection against uninsured motorists. This policy contained an arbitration clause as follows: “6. Arbitration. If any person making claim hereunder and the company do not agree that such person is legally entitled to recover damages from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- In Re Arbitration Between Rosenbaum & American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
- American Universal Insurance v. RansonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- International Union of Electrical Workers v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Ross v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Flood v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Frager v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. MongioviNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Visselli v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.