Legal Opinion

Weissman v. Hokamp

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1937No. [No. 26, October Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

Appealing from a judgment for damages sustained by a pedestrian in a collision with their taxicab, the appellants present for review two rulings of the trial court. The first is the admission in evidence of a report by the taxicab driver to the Public Service Commission, contrary to the prohibition in section 372 of article 23 of the Code. This ruling the court finds insufficient to require a reversal for retrial, because the statements contained in the report added nothing to the evidence unfavorable to the defendants, for they were contained also in a report to the Commissioner of Motor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  3. McNab v. United Railways, Etc., Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Legum v. State Ex Rel. MoranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Hill v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. SavilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Henderson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Boyd, Adm'r v. SimplerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Cohen v. RubinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API