Legal Opinion

Boyd, Adm'r v. Simpler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 23, 1960No. [No. 164, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

After submitting the questions of primary negligence of the defendant and contributory negligence of the plaintiffs’ decedent to the jury and the rendition by the jury of verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs, the learned trial judge granted motions by the defendant for judgments n.o.v., on the ground that the plaintiffs’ decedent had been guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. There are two actions involved : one by the administrator of Pearl M. Boyd, who was killed by an automobile operated by the appellee, under Code (1957), Article 93, Section 112, to recover for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Sun Cab Company, Inc. v. CusickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Belle Isle Cab Co. v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Ford v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Henderson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Beahm v. ShortallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Alston v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Campfield v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Stein v. Overlook Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Moodie v. SantoniCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API