Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 6, 2005No. A05A1578PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

A jury found Dexter Bernard Smith guilty of possessing cocaine and obstructing a law enforcement officer. Smith appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his cocaine conviction. He also argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

1. “On appeal from a criminal conviction, ‘the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in [a] light most favorable to the verdict to determine if the evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Patman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Helton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Gravley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Wilburn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. McKinney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API