Legal Opinion

People v. Congden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Almost one year before the police questioned the defendant and obtained his incriminating statement, the defendant refused to submit to a polygraph test, telling the police that his lawyer told him not to take it. Actually, defendant had not consulted a lawyer and was not represented either at the time he refused to take the1 test or at the time he gave his statement. He testified that he had remembered that sometime in the past an attorney who represented him on another matter told him never to take a polygraph test.

Contrary to defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. RowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. People v. PelkeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API