Legal Opinion
Koehn v. Public Service Commission
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Motions for alternative writs of proMbition.
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
These proceedings arise upon an order to show cause why alternative writs of prohibition *153should, not issue prohibiting the public service commission, for the second district, from continuing an investigation upon which it has entered, as to the reasonableness of the interurban fares set forth in a new tariff filed by the International Bailway Company.
This company includes urban lines in the cities of Buffalo, Lockport and Niagara Falls and certain interurban lines connecting same. It operates two lines between Buffalo and Niagara Falls, one, referred to as the “ high speed line,” having been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Matter of Quinby v. . Public Service Comm.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Village of Mamaroneck v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- People ex rel. New York v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- City of Niagara Falls v. Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1919