Legal Opinion
Village of Mamaroneck v. Public Service Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 5, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCann, J.:
The defendant, respondent, the New York and Stamford Railway Company, is a domestic corporation organized under the Railroad Law of this State as a consolidation of the Larchmont Horse Railway Company and the Port Chester Street Railway Company. It operates a street surface railway from a point in the city of New Rochelle through the towns of Mamaroneck, Harrison and Rye, and the villages of Larchmont, Mamaroneck, Rye and Port Chester, all located in the county of Westchester, and also through the town, village and borough of Greenwich to a terminus in the city of Stamford, all in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of Quinby v. . Public Service Comm.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- People Ex Rel. Village of South Glens Falls v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People Ex Rel. South Shore Traction Co. v. WillcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- People Ex Rel. Garrison v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- People ex rel. New York & North Shore Traction Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lakeland Water District v. Onondaga County Water AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- United Traction Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Village of Brownville v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Mtr. of City of Ny (5th Ave. Coach Lines)New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Mtr. of City of Ny (5th Ave. Coach Lines)New York Court of Appeals · 1966