Hiers v. Southeastern Carolinas Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Fisitburne, Justice.
This was an action in tort to recover damages, actual and punitive, for the wrongful discontinuance of telephone service and removal of a telephone from plaintiff’s place of business in the town of Olar.
The plaintiff charged the defendant, Southeastern Caro-linas Telephone Company, with negligence and willfulness and a conscious disregard of the rights of the plaintiff in the cutting out of his telephone. The answer of the defendant was in effect a general denial. Upon trial, at the close of the testimony offered by the plaintiff, the defendant made a mo tion for a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Charles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Barrett v. Broad River Power CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. HobartMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
- Poole v. Paris Mountain Water Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Gordon v. RothbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gould v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Greenville v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1986
- John D. Hollingsworth on Wheels, Inc. v. Arkon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Kelly v. BrazellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Coosa Valley Telephone Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.