Legal Opinion

Hiers v. Southeastern Carolinas Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1950No. 16332PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fisitburne, Justice.

This was an action in tort to recover damages, actual and punitive, for the wrongful discontinuance of telephone service and removal of a telephone from plaintiff’s place of business in the town of Olar.

The plaintiff charged the defendant, Southeastern Caro-linas Telephone Company, with negligence and willfulness and a conscious disregard of the rights of the plaintiff in the cutting out of his telephone. The answer of the defendant was in effect a general denial. Upon trial, at the close of the testimony offered by the plaintiff, the defendant made a mo tion for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Charles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. Barrett v. Broad River Power CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. HobartMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Poole v. Paris Mountain Water Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. Gordon v. RothbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gould v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  2. City of Greenville v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1986
  3. John D. Hollingsworth on Wheels, Inc. v. Arkon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Kelly v. BrazellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Coosa Valley Telephone Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API