State v. . Noe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
INDICTMENT for forgery, tried before Graham, J., and a jury, at December, 1895, Special Term of Jones Superior Court. On the trial, the same objections were entered to the jurisdiction of the court as were made in the case of State v. Turner, at this Term. The objections were overruled and defendant excepted.
Read the full summary
INDICTMENT for forgery, tried before Graham, J., and a jury, at December, 1895, Special Term of Jones Superior Court. On the trial, the same objections were entered to the jurisdiction of the court as were made in the case of State v. Turner, at this Term. The objections were overruled and defendant excepted. L. A. Garner, a witness for the State, testified that he was a clerk of the superior court of Carteret county and that a bond shown him was the bond of William Eisher for his appearance at Pali Term, 1895, of Carteret superior court, taken before the justice of the peace at the…
1Opinion of the Court
Avery, J.:
The objection to the jurisdiction and the exception to the ruling of the court in admitting the proof of the incorporation of the insurance companies are fully discussed in State v. Turner, at this term. It is therefore needless to repeat the reasons for holding as we did upon assignments of eiror which are identical with those relied on in this case.
Where the genuineness of the paper or the signature to a paper, which it is proposed to make the basis of a comparison of handwriting, is not denied, or cannot be denied, in the trial of the action, an expert witness may, in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. . DegraffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Tunstall v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Croom v. . SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Withaup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Ratliff v. Ratliff.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902