Legal Opinion

Simpson Box & Lumber Co. v. Crilly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment, (one document) and supplementary judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Summary judgment should not have been granted because plaintiff failed to establish the validity of its lien •by sufficient evidentiary facts (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267, 269, 270; Barrett v. Jacobs, 255 N. Y. 520; 2018 Seventh Ave., Inc. v. Nach-Haus Leasing Corp. 289 N. Y. 490, 497) and because the record discloses the likelihood of defenses that depend on evidence in possession of plaintiff and defendant Ranalletta, which is not possessed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Barrett v. JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. 2018 Seventh Avenue, Inc. v. Nach-Haus Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mead v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Hudleasco, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API