Legal Opinion

Zabol v. Lasky

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 10, 1973No. 56978PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

In plaintiff’s suit for $210,500 based on quantum meruit for services rendered, the trial court sustained defendants’ motion for a directed verdict on plaintiff’s opening statement, and this appeal followed. We reverse.

Plaintiff alleged in his petition that he was a licensed real estate broker, that he furnished services to defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Manuel Lasky, which resulted in the sale by them of property ■ at 121 South Meramec, Clayton, Missouri, to the party procured by plaintiff, and that the value of the services was $210,500.

After the jury was sworn an opening…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Butcher v. MainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FlemingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Zabol v. LaskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Vosevich v. Doro, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Brouk v. BrueggeateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Chalet Apartments, Inc. v. Farm & Home Savings Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API