Zabol v. Lasky
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
In plaintiff’s suit for $210,500 based on quantum meruit for services rendered, the trial court sustained defendants’ motion for a directed verdict on plaintiff’s opening statement, and this appeal followed. We reverse.
Plaintiff alleged in his petition that he was a licensed real estate broker, that he furnished services to defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Manuel Lasky, which resulted in the sale by them of property ■ at 121 South Meramec, Clayton, Missouri, to the party procured by plaintiff, and that the value of the services was $210,500.
After the jury was sworn an opening…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Butcher v. MainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FlemingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Zabol v. LaskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Vosevich v. Doro, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Brouk v. BrueggeateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Chalet Apartments, Inc. v. Farm & Home Savings Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.