Legal Opinion

Harter v. DeJoy

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided April 30, 2020No. 2:16-cv-00438Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 4 JUSTIN HARTER, No. 2:16-cv-00438-SMJ 5 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 6 ORAL ARGUMENT AND v. GRANTING IN PART AND 7 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO MEGAN J. BRENNAN, DISMISS 8 POSTMASTER GENERAL, 9 Defendant. 10 11 Before the Court, without oral argument, are Defendant Megan J. Brennan, 12 Postmaster General’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, 13 ECF No. 117,1 and Plaintiff Justin Harter’s Motion for Oral Argument, ECF 14 No. 130. This case involves claims arising from the allegedly discriminatory 15…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API