Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Village of Warrensville Heights v. Fulton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1934No. 24527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

A purely legal question is presented for determination. Is tbe relator entitled to receive from tbe respondent tbe bonds pledged by Tbe Union Trust Company as security for deposit of relator’s funds when tbe indebtedness of the relator to tbe trust company is in a sum larger than tbe amount of such deposit? Or, putting tbe proposition in another way, can a deposit of public funds, representing moneys derived from taxation, be applied by a bank against past due obligations owed to it by tbe political subdivision wbicb is tbe owner of such deposit?

The" relator argues with much force that under…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Georges Township v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. School District No. 4 v. McGrawMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Phillips v. Yates Center National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. George P. Baker, Trustees of the Property of Penn Central Transportation Company v. National City Bank of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Daley v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Daley v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API