Legal Opinion

Hise v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1955No. 35480PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. The plaintiff in an action of trover must show title, either general or special, in herself at the time of the institution of the suit, actual possession, or right of immediate possession (Livingston v. Epsten-Roberts Co., 50 Ga. App. 25, 177 S. E. 79, and the numerous cases there cited); and, where, in such an action, the plaintiff, the landlord of the defendant, shows without contradiction that she and the defendant went together to an automobile dealer, where she, with her own money, paid the full purchase price for the automobile for which the present action has been brought, but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Livingston v. Epsten-Roberts Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Butler Marble & Granite Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. James v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  5. Dixie Manufacturing Co. v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitworth v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Brock v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. Hasty v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Leslie Renee Smith v. Russell TibbitsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API