Dixie Manufacturing Co. v. Ricks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The first headnote does not require any further statement.
One of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of in the amended motion for a new trial is as follows: “For the plaintiff to recover in this case, it is necessary for you to find, as a matter of fact, that the defendant employed him, that at the time he was under fourteen years of age, or that he was employed to work at night under the age of fourteen and a half years, that he was injured while so employed, that the injury was not the result of such contributory negligence that would…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Powell v. Augusta & Summerville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Realty Bond & Mortgage Co. v. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Ransone v. ChristianSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hotel Equipment Co. v. LiddellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Grasham v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Sarman v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Kirkland v. BrewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.