Menotti v. Dillon
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
This action was commenced in the District Court of the third judicial district of California.
The complaint alleged, that on the 23d day of April, 1873, the original plaintiff, Charles McLaughlin, became the owner in fee simple and entitled to the possession of the south half of section twenty-one, in township seven, south, of range three west, of the Mount Diablo base and meridian, according to the United States survey; that thereafter he continued to be the owner and was entitled to the possession of said land; but that on the above, date the defendant Menotti entered into possession, ousted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bullard v. Des Moines & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Huff v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
3Cited by14 opinions
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Nelson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sjoli v. DreschelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Oregon & California RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Wenberg v. Gibbs TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.