Legal Opinion
Sebrite Agency, Inc. v. Platt
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 7, 2012No. Case No. 11-CV-3526 (PJS/SER)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sebrite Agency, Inc. (“Sebrite”) is a small insurance agency located in Minnetonka, Minnesota. Defendant Arthur Platt worked as an agent for Sebrite. Defendant Denise Wishcop is Platt’s girlfriend. Platt was fired by Sebrite in 2011, after Sebrite learned that Platt had established a competing agency for the purpose of stealing Sebrite’s clients. It does not appear that Platt was successful in permanently diverting any significant amount of business from Sebrite. It also appears that Sebrite will have trouble recovering…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- AlixPartners, LLP and AlixPartners Holdings, LLP v. David BenichouCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019
- Clayborne v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, TheDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- In re: EpiPen Direct Purchaser LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Isis Gipson v. Boston Scientific Scimed Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- Lunde v. SchultzDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.