Legal Opinion

Van Emon v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1888No. 12622PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application for a writ of review. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

This is an application for a writ of review. The respondent in a probate proceeding made an order authorizing Robert Baker, administrator of the estate of John W. Miller, deceased, to cause a monument to be erected at the grave of deceased at an expense not exceeding fifteen hundred dollars. Petitioners, who are heirs of deceased, asked to have said order annulled on the ground of want of jurisdiction in the court to make it. The contention of petitioners is, that the jurisdiction of superior courts in matters of probate is defined by statute, and that the statute does not authorize the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bendall's Distributees v. Bendall's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  2. Fairman's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  3. Charles v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richardson v. McCloskeyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In Re Wilson's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Pease v. ChristmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Crothers v. CrothersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Gooch v. BeasleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API