Legal Opinion

Greene v. Armco, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 1, 1988No. CV 83-1196 MRPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PFAELZER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Walter Greene, Jr. sues Armco, Inc. (“Armco”), the law firm of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison (“Brobeck”), and two of Brobeck’s members, attorneys James L. Meeder and William C. Anderson, for malicious prosecution, interference with prospective business advantage, and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The malicious prosecution claim is based on an abuse of process action that the defendants formerly brought against Greene. The interference with prospective business advantage claim is based on statements Meeder made to the California State Bar regarding…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Rush Pettway and Peter J. Wrenn v. American Cast Iron Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API