Legal Opinion
Willametz v. Susi
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 27, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 70-334PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FRANK J. MURRAY, District Judge.
Defendants Joseph and Mary Susi moved, pursuant to Rule 12, Fed.R.Civ. P., to dismiss this action on the ground they were served with process after being enticed by false representations to come to Massachusetts. The question presented is whether there was such an abuse of the process of this court that the court will not enforce its jurisdiction against the moving parties but will set the process aside. See, e. g., Fitzgerald and Malloy Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald, 137 U.S. 98, 11 S.Ct. 36, 34 L.Ed. 608 (1890); Union Sugar Refinery v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cheshire National Bank v. JaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Gulda v. Second National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Wyman v. NewhouseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Joseph Buchanan and Eva Buchanan v. Jack WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Klavan v. KlavanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989