Oldwine v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
A jury convicted Oldwine and Hummons of violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act by selling thirty-one pounds of marijuana, OCGA § 16-13-30 (j) (1). Each defendant appeals his conviction and sentence and Hummons also appeals the denial of his motion for new trial.
1. Both appellants claim that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to uphold the convictions so that the court should have directed verdicts of acquittal as to the sale.
The evidence construed so as to uphold the verdict, Rhodes v. State, 168 Ga. App. 10, 11 (1) (308 SE2d 33) (1983), showed the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gibbons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Castell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Muckle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Amis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Wimberly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989