Legal Opinion

Falkenstein v. Pishioneri

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1986No. 16-84-01486; CA A34368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Plaintiff seller appeals the trial court’s judgment after granting defendant buyer a summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs action at law for breach of a land sale contract. ORCP 47B. We find that there are issues of material fact to be resolved and reverse and remand.

Plaintiff seeks to recover a balloon payment and installments past due on March 1, 1984, under a land sale contract. These are the facts gathered from the pleadings and affidavits. On November 28, 1980, plaintiff and defendant entered into a land sale contract 1 which provided for $3,000 to be paid on execution, $35,000 to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kutbi v. Thunderlion Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Braught v. GranasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Elliott v. Oregon International Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vision Realty, Inc. v. KohlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Phoenix-Talent School District 4 v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Zerba v. Ideal Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API