Tyson v. Shoemaker

*33ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

This court, in the opinion previously rendered, held that the existence of a stop sign, though unofficial, and the failure of the plaintiff to heed the sign, were relevant matters in a consideration of the diligence and negligence of the parties, and that the trial court erred in striking the defendant’s amendments pleading the unofficial stop sign.

Counsel for the plaintiff in their motion for rehearing argue that the effect of the court’s ruling is to hold “that an unofficial stop sign may be shown to have been placed for the purpose of changing the rules of the road…