Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 16, 1954No. Nos. 12042-12050PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought these nine separate actions against separate defendants to recover damages for violations of a price stabilization regulation issued pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended. Sections 2061-2166, Title 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix. Jurisdiction in the District. Court was conferred by § 706(b) of the Act, § 2156 (b), Title 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, and by § 1345 Title 28 U.S.Code.
The complaint in the case against Lawrence Smith is typical and presents the issue involved in all the cases. It charged that the defendant was engaged in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Bauer v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Washington Ex Rel. Stimson Lumber Co. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- W. N. Stevenson & Co. v. HartmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. Ted CheathamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Med-Trans Corp. v. BentonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1978
- Von Der Ahe Van Lines, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Semon v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.