Legal Opinion

Bryant v. P. H. Whiting & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1933No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 36,691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

By consent of counsel these two cases were tried at the same time before the court and without a jury. A judgment in favor of each of the plaintiffs was rendered against both defendants, from which the defendant Whiting & Company, hereafter called the defendant, has taken this appeal.

The plaintiff Sarah E. Bryant is the mother of the plaintiff Ralph Bryant. Mayme Bryant is his wife. They live some distance from each other. The defendant George E. Brennan was formerly a stock salesman for Henry L. Doherty & Company, and as such purchased certain stock of the Cities Service Company for all of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Timmerman v. BultmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. N. B. Lesher, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Wilkerson Estate Hill v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API