Legal Opinion

Rull v. Brazauskas

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 1, 1956No. 378; No. 4944Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrooks, J.

This is an action of contract in which plaintiff seeks to recover a broker’s commission in the amount of $500 from defendant. The plaintiff’s declaration is in three counts. Count 1 alleges, in substance, that defendant employed plaintiff, a real estate broker, to procure a sale of certain real property in South Boston on terms satisfactory to defendant and agreed to pay broker’s commission. The count further alleges that plaintiff did procure a customer ready, willing and able to purchase the property on defendant’s terms, but that defendant refused to pay the commission. Count 2 alleges, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Barsky v. HansenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Henderson & Beal, Inc. v. GlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API