Legal Opinion

Hubert v. Lawson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1978No. 56089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant sued Lawson and Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. on a promissory note. The corporation failed to answer, and on October 12, 1976, a default judgment was entered against it. At a later date Hubert appealed a judgment dismissing his complaint as to the codefendant Lawson, which appeal was dismissed in this court as premature. Hubert v. Lawson, 142 Ga. App. 573 (237 SE2d 18) (1977). A counterclaim filed by Lawson was eventually dismissed and this appeal followed. Held:

1. Code § 109A-3 — 118 provides in part: "The following rules apply to every instrument: . .…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ghitter v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Purcell v. JoynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Almand v. HathcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Simpson v. WagesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Hubert v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Magnan v. Miami Aircraft Support, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Mishler v. StouwieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Erwin v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API