Buntzman v. Springfield Redevelopment Authority
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PONSOR, United States Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants’ Motions to Compel (Docket Nos. 148 and 149) are hereby ALLOWED, with the following provisions. The SRA’s request for unspecified “financial statements” is hereby DENIED on the grounds of vagueness, burdensomeness and overbreadth. The plaintiff is required to disclose only tax returns for the years 1986, 1987, 1988 and 1989. The disclosure will be made in accordance with any existing confidentiality agreements, or if no such agreement exists, on the understanding that the returns may…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime FamilyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. KruegerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Weiner v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ceridian Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Evans v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- Pedraza v. Holiday Housewares, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Cadrin v. Trans Spec Truck Service, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003
- Driscoll v. McCannDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.