Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ceridian Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 16, 2008No. Civil 07-4086 (DSD/JJG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JEANNE J. GRAHAM, United States Magistrate Judge.

The above-entitled matter came before the undersigned on August 26, 2008 on a motion to compel (Doc. No. 14) by defendant Ceridian Corporation (Ceridian). Nicholas J. Pladson, Esq., appeared for plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the EEOC). Michael C. Wilhelm, Esq., appeared for defendant Ceridian. Being duly advised of all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Ceridian’s motion to compel discovery (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED.

2. The following memorandum is incorporated by reference.

MEMORANDUM

In…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  4. Hilt v. SFC Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  5. Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. ASI, Inc. v. Aquawood, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  2. Bachman v. BachmanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
  3. Benne v. Quick Med Claims, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
  4. Brinkman v. Summit Fire Protection Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  5. Jean-Paul Gadbois v. Arrow International Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API