Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 15, 1868PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNott, J.

In the first or parent case which this claimant brought against the defendants, the theory of his demand was that the government had taken his property absolutely, for which he should recover either the full compensation which is given whenever private property is taken for public use, or the ample damages which the law accords to a party injured by trespass.” This. compensation or damage was laid at $2,000,000.

"When the case came to be tried, we were satisfied that the government had not taken his property for a fixed military reservation, but, on the contrary, occupied it temporarily and at…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. 70.39 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  2. United States v. 16.747 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  3. United States v. BaumanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1943
  4. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1890
  5. Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API