Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker Liquors Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 9, 1977No. C.R.D. 77-5; Court 74-11-03088PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BOE, Judge:

Pursuant to rules 4.7(b)(2) and 4.12 of the rules of court, the defendant has moved to dismiss the above-entitled action for lack of jurisdiction because of plaintiff’s failure to timely file the summons in said action pursuant to 28 U.S.C., section 2631(a), providing:

§ 2631. Time for commencement of action(a) An action over which the court has jurisdiction under section 1582(a) of this title is barred unless commenced within one hundred and eighty days after:(1) the date of mailing of notice of denial, in whole or in part of a protest pursuant to the provisions…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  2. Tikal Distributing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  3. Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  4. FW Myers & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. Bond Street, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API