Legal Opinion

Spring v. Day

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided March 15, 1873PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion for retaxation of costs.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

This action was first tried at the May term, 1868. The jury disagreed. A second trial was had at a trial term in January, 1873, which resulted in a verdict for defendant Day, each trial occupied more than two days.

Defendant claims as costs a trial fee ot thirty dollars for each of the terms, also fifteen dollars for proceedings after notice of, and before each trial.

A trial fee of. thirty dollars is allowed for " every trial ” of an issue of fact (Code § 307, Sub. 4).

This clearly warrants a trial fee, although the jury should disagree, and also a second fee on a subsequent trial (Hamilton…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Seifter v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Adams v. New York, Lake Erie & W. R. R. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Zelmanovitz v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
  4. Kummer v. Christopher & Tenth St. RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Lafond v. JetzkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API