Spring v. Day
The Superior Court of New York City
Motion for retaxation of costs.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.
This action was first tried at the May term, 1868. The jury disagreed. A second trial was had at a trial term in January, 1873, which resulted in a verdict for defendant Day, each trial occupied more than two days.
Defendant claims as costs a trial fee ot thirty dollars for each of the terms, also fifteen dollars for proceedings after notice of, and before each trial.
A trial fee of. thirty dollars is allowed for " every trial ” of an issue of fact (Code § 307, Sub. 4).
This clearly warrants a trial fee, although the jury should disagree, and also a second fee on a subsequent trial (Hamilton…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Seifter v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Adams v. New York, Lake Erie & W. R. R. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888
- Zelmanovitz v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
- Kummer v. Christopher & Tenth St. RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Lafond v. JetzkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.