Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.
This case really represents a belated motion for reconsideration of this court’s decision entitled In re Tennessee Central Railway Co., 463 F.2d 73 (6th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Rodes, 409 U.S. 893, 93 S.Ct. 119, 34 L.Ed.2d 150, rehearing denied, 409 U.S. 1029, 93 S.Ct. 459, 34 L.Ed.2d 323 (1972).1 There, on the theory of an equitable priority as to operating costs involved in the six months prior to bankruptcy, the railroads, who are appellants in this instance, sought priority over the claims of the United States Government…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In the Matter of Tennessee Central Railway Company, Debtor. United States of America v. A. Battle Rodes, Trustee of Tennessee Central Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- In Re Inland Gas Corp. (Five Cases)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Clouatre v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tennessee Central Railway Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974