Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Staton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 2010No. 538 CAPPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

In this direct capital appeal, which has yet to be briefed, appellant Andre Staton’s court-appointed counsel Thomas N. Farrell, Esquire (hereafter “counsel”), filed a Motion to Withdraw on July 21, 2010, alleging that appellant sent correspondence to counsel “terminating” counsel’s representation. Counsel believed that appellant’s correspondence created an obligation to move to withdraw. On the merits of the motion, however, counsel forwards a novel and cogent argument against withdrawal, which occasions this Opinion, and which we will discuss below. For the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. FigueroaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Brooks, W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. StatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API