Legal Opinion

Waks v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1962No. 163PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the appellants, petitioners below, on their claim for the return of property escheated to the state. One Arthur Silverman died intestate at Sitka, Alaska, in 1946, leaving an estate of the appraised value of $51,819.-79. Two years later the residue of the estate escheated to the Territory (now State) of Alaska by order of the probate court. On June 3, 1955, the appellants filed a petition in the lower court in which they claimed to be the heirs of the Arthur Sil-verman above named and asked that they be awarded the escheated property.

As…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Link's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Seddon v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. State v. GroomsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Thomson v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slomowitz v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Saxton v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In re C. G.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Thompson v. Guyer-HaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Dairy Queen of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API