Legal Opinion

Stocum v. Oakley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2007No. COA06-957PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

This cause of action arose after Dr. Ward Sayre Oakley, Jr., who was employed by Pinehurst Surgical Clinic, P.A., performed surgery on Keith Stocum, Jr. Keith Stocum, Jr. and Cynthia Stocum (“plaintiffs”) sued Pinehurst and Dr. Oakley (“defendants”) for bodily injuries and loss of consortium. Plaintiffs also asserted claims for res ipsa loquitur, a claim for foreign object left in a body, and constructive fraud. Plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their complaint. After careful consideration, we affirm.

Plaintiffs filed their first complaint against defendants on 1 October…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Bryson v. SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Brisson v. Kathy A. Santoriello, M.D., P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Estrada v. BurnhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Funderburk v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Bishop v. County of MacOnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Bb&t Boli Plan Tr. v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2016
  5. Dapper Dev., L.L.C. v. CordellNorth Carolina Business Court · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API