Legal Opinion

Board of Supervisors v. Stephens

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1918No. Civil No. 1647PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the comity of Yavapai. Prank H. Lyman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, C. J.

The appellees commenced this action to prevent the hoard of supervisors from paying the county recorder, county treasurer, county attorney, county assessor and county superintendent of schools, officers of said county, their salaries as provided by chapter 61, laws of 1917. The plaintiffs contend that said officers’ salaries were provided by chapter 2, title 26, Revised Statutes of Arizona of 1901, and laws amending same, .at the beginning of said officers’ terms of office, viz., on the first Monday of January, 1917, and that the legislature is prohibited, by section 17 of article 4, state…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Butler v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  2. County of Crawford v. NashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  3. County of Yuma v. SturgesArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hunt v. Mohave CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Rucker v. SupervisorsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Powers v. IsleyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Shearer v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. State Consolidated Publishing Co. v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Gay v. City of GlendaleArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Employees' Retirement System v. HoHawaii Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API