Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Employees' Retirement System v. Ho
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1960No. 4178Published
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION OP
CASSIDY, J.
The ultimate issue for decision under the submission on agreed facts in this case is whether or not Act 22 and Act 23, First Special Session, First Legislature, State of Hawaii, or either of them, can be upheld against the contention that they violate the State debt limitations of the Constitution.
The key constitutional provisions are contained in Article VI, section 3, paragraph 2, which reads: “Sixty million dollars is established as the limit of the funded debt of the State at any time outstanding and unpaid. Bonds and other instruments of indebtedness in…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- National Bank v. County of YanktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- The People Ex Rel. Jackson v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Nunnemacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.