Legal Opinion
Edenfield v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided November 1, 1995No. 92-1263PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLDAWAY, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court.
HOLDAWAY, Judge:
The appellant appeals a September 4,1992, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision that denied entitlement to service connection for syphilis. Record (R.) at 4-9. The Court finds that the appellant did not submit a well-grounded claim, and will affirm the Board’s decision. On May 10, 1994, we ordered this matter consolidated with Smith v. Brown, (92-1263). That order is hereby revoked and the Court’s opinion in Smith will be issued separately.
I. Factual Background
The appellant served on active duty in the United States…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Murphy v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Layno v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Espiritu v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Thurber v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hickson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- L IZZIE K. M AY FIELD v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Savage v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Cohen v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Evans v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.