Legal Opinion
Mintz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if there were error in the form of the two specific questions submitted to the jury such error does not constitute reversible error when the charge as a whole is considered. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.
2Cited by5 opinions
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Barbato v. VollmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Halper v. Ætna Life InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Cross Armored Carrier Corp. v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Jacobowitz v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960